Comments on: Mobile Web Requests India ???

By: Anurag Pathak

Anurag Pathak — Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:22:21 +0000

GooseBerry has made it possible to be connected with your Emails 24 X 7, without internet or GPRS connection. You can receive and reply to your emails using SMS. You can select which emails get to reach you on your phone. The Email content is compressed by upto 30% to ensure that you get only the important part of email on your phone. All that one needs is a mobile phone that supports SMS. It works across GSM and CDMA networks.

Typically people spend heavily on costly devices (20 – 30K) and data plans (800 – 1100 per month) to be able to stay in touch with their emails. WithGooseBerry you can acheive the same with as amount low as Rs 95 per month! A 40 person company can save around Rs 24 Lakh over a 2.5 years period by using GooseBerry instead of currently available options.
Gooseberry supports 37 email servers as of Jan 2009, including corporate emails, gmail, yahoo, ibibo etc. Every day support for more email servers is being added as users from various companies are requesting for the same.

Few Advantages of GooseBerry.in
The service runs on any mobile on the planet without needing to install anything.

You don’t need to have a special hardware i:e Blackberry or Mobile with GPRS/3G capability
Cost: The cost of this service is a fraction of the rental cost of Blackberry or data plan (GPRS) which you would have.
You can create filters so that you dont get unwanted emails on your device.

There are no extra charges on roaming as well (Saves quite a bit of money).

It takes minutes to start this service for you.

With every one going into cost saving mode, this might be the solution companies are looking for!

By: Sameer

Sameer — Tue, 18 Mar 2008 13:16:43 +0000

Dear rajan. i guess we share acommon question on who are these users and how are they paying through their noses for high GPRS plans. iam right now studying indinmarket for launching Rocketalk a mobile phone basd social network in india. andthe biggest challenge is that no body knows how many actual GPRS users re there in india. and of all the people who are what are these people using t for, i guess here in india people confuse even going to an operators walled garden wap site say airtel live as a GPRS use and count it in the gprs users. when TRAI came out with the figure of 38miilion gprs users i guess they counted for every erson who has even gone on operatrs wap sites for downloadng a ringtone or a wallpaper. what are your veiws on this. can you guide where is the best ace to understand the GPRS market in India

By: Banibrata Dutta

Banibrata Dutta — Sun, 25 Nov 2007 14:37:23 +0000

Mowser, OperaMini etc. (i.e. content adaptors) are most favoured (I’d tend to assume) or useful in fairly bandwidth limited browsing environments. Given that India not only has one of the cheapest mobile data-transfer rates but also is restricted largely to GPRS as the underlying transport technology, there-by limiting transfer speeds. Which might explain that people (and we have lots and lots of people in India, of course), who might “experiment” (rather than, use regularly — I’d guess, once again), web-browsing using mobile devices, over slow networks, at rather cheap rates. I’d assume that Mowser (or OperaMini) geographic usage stats are not single yard-sticks to measure global mobile-webbrowsing usage, in true sense. Look at the number of countries having higher speed internet (EDGE to begin with, and 3G / 3.5G). Many of these countries have started offering bundled &/ flat-rate data-plans only recently making it truely affordable. As soon as subscribers in these countries start using more capable smart-phones (with bigger displays), native browsers would most probably overtake the content-adaptors.

Also, the usage of less-capable handsets (e.g. with smaller display area), and on slow speed networks (sa. GPRS), may be also through Laptops, which would not use the mowsers. I’d assume a rather large part of the mobile-enterprise customers to fall in this catagory.

So, I’m kind of not too surprised at this stats (I think those can be explained), but doubt that they are a global and wide-spectrum measure.

By: giocare red lounge casinò

giocare red lounge casinò — Tue, 06 Nov 2007 19:29:28 +0000

giocare red lounge casinò

optional fawning sonny kept lizards

By: Rajan

Rajan — Tue, 06 Nov 2007 08:39:09 +0000

Sanyam,
There are more than 50 million phones that have browser(GPRS capable) for sure. The question of do they actually use it is the pertinent one. I don’t know but these numbers seem to suggest so and I believe these numbers which are taken out of actual logs.

I chatted with Miker at Admob and he said that these numbers are very much true and I also trust the posts made by Russ. IMO they are bazillion times more reliable than any IDG/Gartner reports.

Now I am just now trying to make sense of what these requests are looking for and where they are eventually landing ?

By: sanyam

sanyam — Tue, 06 Nov 2007 07:09:46 +0000

i cannot belive the numbers :-O

How many mobiles do we see who have browsers in the first place and those people who have such mobiles, do they actually use gprs?

I can accept some traffic from india but these are stragely very very high numbers and that too just from mowser.

By: Fring de! India « Sukshma

Fring de! India « Sukshma — Tue, 06 Nov 2007 02:58:24 +0000

[...] in India is Mowser who claim to receive more than twice as many mobile requests from India alone. Rajan attributes that interest primarily to dial-up users from India who use Mowser and other content adaptation engines for [...]

By: Santosh

Santosh — Tue, 06 Nov 2007 02:30:32 +0000

Wow! Even if you accounted for the dial up users, India is still surprisingly ahead – I think the traffic is skewed heavily for this application?